Early days, and all that, but one of the main threads that is coming out in the aftermath of the flight MH17 is that Putin provided these pro-Russian forces with some pretty advanced weaponry. Take a look at Josh Marshall, for example, whose key paragraph is:
The audio tapes posted by The New York Times might as well be from some future Russia-based version of Waiting for Guffman or Best in Show, a comical rendering of rustics and morons stumbling into an event of vast carnage and international consequence mainly because they’re hotheads and idiots – the kind of people no one in their right minds would give world class weaponry to. It’s like finding some white supremacist/militia types on their little compound in the inter-Mountain west and giving them world class missile launchers and heavy armaments.
Not sure what evidence there is that these guys are morons and/or hotheads, and that no one in their right minds would give weapons to, but America has been giving some pretty stupid people, like, say, Saddam Hussein, and any other pro-Whatever forces some weapons to do some stupid things with.
I’ll leave that train of thought, first because America didn’t directly give Hussein actual weapons, but instead arranged to make sure he had some, and secondly because the bigger train of thought is this:
All this weaponry that is laying around, eventually will be put into the hand of a “moron” or just plain troublemaker, who could do some pretty stupid things with it, including the initial act of a war that results in the death of our very planet.
Posted by amorris on July 19, 2014
So people are thinking that there will be an iWatch out from Apple come this October. I haven’t seen a picture of anything that I think:
- I would wear, or
- That someone else would wear, either (for more than a week)
If Apple is doing an iWatch, given their design process and philosophy, this is what it will be:
- It will look more like clothes than a gadget.
- Bracelet, or necklace-like. In other words, not a watch.
- Water proof to x feet. Think swimming and showering with the thing.
- No camera at all. Not in version 1.
- Connects to your other devices, an extension of your other devices.
- Minimal user interface, if any at all.
I don’t for a second think that Apple is going to release a product that will have an X or Y feature that everyone will want. Apple designs from the ground up, in other words, first and foremost it will be something smart that is worth wearing once or twice, and then after that there will be some killer functions that people will keep wearing it for.
Posted by amorris on June 29, 2014
Turns out that there are real reason to cast doubt on the idea that the universe is probably teeming with intelligent life. Sure, maybe it has loads and loads of microbes, but human-like species? We may well be the first, and almost certainly the only one in our galaxy.
The argument comes from the observation that there just aren’t any self-replicating robots anywhere to be found in space.
Posted by amorris on June 29, 2014
I signed up as an Apple Developer, because I had heard some really amazing things coming out of WWDC 2014. Apparently, and I’ll let readers find out for themselves, that conference pretty much ushered in The New Apple. The amount of stuff they unleashed to the world is just so comprehensive, and so futurist-looking, that if you’re a developer-minded person, you just have to open your mouth in awe.
Previously, I hadn’t been attracted to the Mac development stuff for one major reason: Objective-C. I just can’t stand writing C code. I know what pointers are, and I know why we’re always checking for nil, but my brain doesn’t like those sort of low-level stuff. That’s why I do everything I can in Python: It’s just the best high-level language there is. Plus, Objective-C has all those horrible names with NS prefixes all over the place, another thing that drives me mad. Reading Objective-C code just makes it so hard. I’m a teacher and anything I develop I don’t have spare hours unpacking stuff. Just let me code it up.
And now Apple has launched Swift, and like most Apple programmer geeks, I consumed the book, and, not only is it Python-like but it levels the playing field considerably. If you’re a guy that’s always wanted to enter the Mac development ecosphere (hand goes up real high) but has been traumatised at the thought of having to dive into unlearning everything you know just to start learning everything again, now is the time to do it.
It’s funny, because I got serious into Python when they launched Python 3, which was a similar situation.
I think this is my way of announcing to the world that I’m going to be making a Mac program within the year. Hmm.. I wonder what sort of project I might work on.
Posted by amorris on June 14, 2014
I never heard of MetaFilter, but reading about their imminent demise makes for interesting reflection. Think about it, entire ecosystems depend entirely on two Google services:
And those services are:
The other week a colleague was ruminating on the fact that they are starting to avoid Facebook because, well, it was getting to be just too much. Sort of like Google, entire livelihoods depend upon services that Facebook provides, but all it does is solve a fairly simple problem: Staying in touch with people. Google solved the “how do I find stuff on the internet” problem.
So, I coin here term ‘super pillar’ as an online service where millions of other services depend upon it.
The same colleague asked out loud “is there anything on the internet that is forever”… to which I replied “email”. However, despite email’s horrible reputation for millions of spam bots everywhere, it truly is one of the few things that is “forever” on the Internet. And email is:
Although it doesn’t quite qualify as Open Source, in a way it is the first successful “open source-ish” project that the Internet had, and it remains today as the foremost service the Internet offers. Interesting to think that both Google and Facebook have answers to the problems that email solves…
Posted by amorris on May 24, 2014
In college I remember going to the computer lab and firing up the message forums and email and having to log in with my username and password, which were provided to me by West Chester University. It wasn’t the beginning of my online connective-ness, but it is a fond memory because that signifies the time that I started checking the internet constantly for content.
To this day, that password, which was randomly generated, with a capital letter, a symbol character, and at least six digits, is my go-to password for low-security websites. I understand the wisdom in not using the same password everywhere, and I don’t, but for websites that I couldn’t care less about, I just use my old college one. It’s not a password based off of my last name or my birthday or any other such nonsense, and so isn’t easily cracked.
It was a solid password to use… for fifteen years.
Goes to show you, that … really now … you really, really do have to manage your passwords.
Posted by amorris on May 17, 2014
After looking around the internet, I couldn’t find the answer in a single place, but I figured it out and so I might as well publish it here.
If what you want is to make a script so that all the user has to do is double-click something or run a script and their computer will use “XYZ PRINTER” default printer whenever they print, this is the sequence that works:
defaults write ~/Library/Preferences/org.cups.PrintingPrefs.plist UseLastPrinter -bool FALSE
lpoptions -d XYZ_PRINTER
The way it works is that line 1 turns off the “Use last printer” system preference that is the default setting. Then the second line actually sets the default printer. You’d think that all you need is the second line, but the “Use last printer” overrides it, so if you try doing just the second line nothing happens. It’s not obvious, unless you see it right in front of you like it is now
You can make this into an AppleScript pretty easily. Note that you have to replace any spaces in the name of the printer with an underscore.
Posted by amorris on April 7, 2014
…they could cover a mind-boggling once-in-a-lifetime story like the iPhone launch.
That’s why so many of them are crapping so often on the “lack of innovation” that’s supposedly not happening these days, despite the fact the clear evidence (as given by the many who disagree with that premise) is that in fact innovation is streaming along quite nicely.
What they really want to have happen is for a Jobs-esque figure to get up on that podium and blow everyone’s mind away. So they can cover it. Problem is, you can’t will that sort of stuff to happen.
Posted by amorris on December 29, 2013
I often say this too, especially on short flights: “Why can’t I read my Kindle during take-off and landing?”
All hail Nick Bolton.
Posted by amorris on December 29, 2013
My parents got me a Kindle 6″. I’m a previous sometimes user of the original first-generation Kindle, and I found it to be a great purchase.
First of all, I bought the cheapest, simplest Kindle, and wasn’t at all interested in the Fire or anything fancy. I already have an iPad and use that for all of my consumer needs sans reading. I love the e-ink feature that the simple Kindle has, and is the main reason for buying it. My father has twice reported that he thought the contrast wasn’t enough, so it might be worth having a look before buying, but I for one love how it’s off-white like paper.
The best part about it is that you can hold it and turn pages with one hand. This feature is great for reading because it means you can do so many other things with it as well. Do some reading during commercials or those in-between times you have. I gave my wife a massage while reading. If you have your iPhone with you, you can read on-the-go as well, due to its automatic read-syncing feature. The buttons are particularly well placed to make for easy turning.
The worst part about it though is that it’s essentially an advertising device. The upshot is that’s why it’s so cheap, because Amazon is selling them to sell more content. Which is a fair enough tactic and completely understandable, especially since this device is essentially an extension of your Amazon account. (To think otherwise is folly.) However, I still have to take it down a few points of my imaginary scale (out of 50 for no reason) for the advertisements on the home screen. I mean, I get the commercials on the screen saver bit, but on the home screen. Even, the same advertisement that I get on the home screen? C’mon?
So, it get my “highly recommended” (45 out of 50!) assuming that you already have an Amazon account, and are prepared to spend a bit more money on content.
Posted by amorris on December 26, 2013